User Research & Validation Plan
Validation Objective
Validate the core assumptions behind SkillSwap's hyperlocal skill exchange platform before significant development investment. Focus on testing problem severity, solution appeal, and community adoption dynamics in suburban neighborhoods.
1. Key Assumptions to Validate
Critical assumptions across problem, solution, and business dimensions that must be validated before scaling.
| Assumption | Risk if Wrong | Validation Method | Target Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neighbors want to exchange skills but lack a trusted platform | Critical | Interviews, surveys, landing page | 80%+ confirm pain point in interviews |
| Current solutions (Nextdoor, Craigslist) are inadequate for skill exchange | High | Competitive analysis + user interviews | 70%+ express dissatisfaction with current options |
| Time-based credit system will be perceived as fair | Critical | Prototype testing, pricing interviews | 60%+ accept egalitarian principle |
| Suburban homeowners (35-65) are most receptive to this concept | High | Segmented surveys, interviews | This segment shows 2x higher interest than others |
| Community vouch system will build sufficient trust | Critical | Pilot testing with real exchanges | 80%+ of exchanges completed without issues |
| Users will complete exchanges within 3-mile radius | Medium | Pilot testing, location data analysis | 70%+ of matches occur within target radius |
| Premium tier ($4.99/month) will convert at 5%+ of users | High | Pricing tests, fake door experiments | 5%+ conversion rate in tests |
| HOAs/community associations will pay for group features | High | B2B interviews, pilot partnerships | 3+ pilot communities sign up |
| Credit expiration will maintain community health | Medium | Pilot testing, user feedback | 80%+ of credits are used within expiration period |
2. Customer Discovery Interview Guide
60-90 minute interview framework to understand neighborhood dynamics and skill exchange behaviors.
Part 1: Background & Context (10 min)
- Tell me about your neighborhood - how long have you lived here?
- What do you like most about living here? What could be better?
- How well do you know your neighbors? Do you interact regularly?
- What kinds of skills or hobbies do you have that others might find useful?
- What kinds of help do you wish you could get from neighbors?
Part 2: Problem Exploration (20 min)
For those who've needed help:
- Walk me through the last time you needed help with something a neighbor could have helped with.
- How did you handle it? What options did you consider?
- What was frustrating about the experience?
- How much time/money did it cost you?
- Did you ask anyone in your neighborhood for help? Why or why not?
For those who've offered help:
- Have you ever helped a neighbor with a skill or service? Tell me about it.
- What was rewarding about it? What was challenging?
- Would you do it again? Why or why not?
- How did you feel about receiving something in return?
Part 3: Current Solutions (15 min)
- What platforms or methods have you used to find help or offer help in your community? (Nextdoor, Facebook, Craigslist, etc.)
- What do you like about these platforms?
- What frustrates you about them?
- Have you ever had a bad experience using these? Tell me about it.
- How do you typically verify that someone is trustworthy before meeting them?
- What would make you more likely to use a platform like this?
Part 4: Solution Exploration (15 min)
[Show simple wireframe or describe concept]
- What's your first reaction to this concept?
- What would be most valuable about this for you?
- What concerns would you have about using this?
- How would you feel about the time-based credit system?
- What would make you trust this platform enough to use it?
- What features would be essential for you to try this?
- How much would you expect to pay for something like this? ($0, $5/month, $10/month, etc.)
- Would you prefer a subscription model or pay-per-exchange?
Part 5: Wrap-up (10 min)
- On a scale of 1-10, how painful is the problem of finding trusted help in your neighborhood?
- On a scale of 1-10, how interested are you in this solution?
- What would make that number higher?
- Would you be interested in being a beta tester for this?
- Who else in your neighborhood should I talk to about this?
- Any final thoughts or concerns I haven't asked about?
Interview Logistics
- Target interviews: 30 minimum (10 from each primary persona: suburban homeowners, retirees, young families)
- Recruitment channels: Nextdoor, Facebook neighborhood groups, HOA newsletters, local community centers, warm intros
- Incentive: $25 gift card to local coffee shop or $50 Amazon gift card
- Recording: Ask permission, use Otter.ai for transcription
- Note-taking template: Create Google Doc with sections for problem quotes, solution reactions, pricing signals, and trust concerns
- Scheduling: Use Calendly with 30/60 minute slots
3. Survey Design
Screening Survey (5-10 questions)
Purpose: Build a pool of validated target users for deeper research. Target: 200+ responses.
-
What best describes your current living situation?
[ ] Single-family home in suburban neighborhood
[ ] Apartment/condo in urban area
[ ] Townhome in planned community
[ ] Rural/farm property
[ ] Other: ________ -
How long have you lived in your current neighborhood?
[ ] Less than 1 year
[ ] 1-3 years
[ ] 3-5 years
[ ] 5-10 years
[ ] 10+ years -
How often do you interact with your neighbors?
[ ] Daily
[ ] Weekly
[ ] Monthly
[ ] A few times a year
[ ] Rarely/never -
Which of these skills do you have that you'd be willing to share with neighbors? (Select all that apply)
[ ] Home repair/handyman
[ ] Gardening/yard work
[ ] Cooking/baking
[ ] Childcare
[ ] Tutoring/teaching
[ ] Tech support/computer help
[ ] Language instruction
[ ] Music lessons
[ ] Fitness training
[ ] Pet care
[ ] Other: ________
[ ] None - I don't have skills to share -
Which of these would you be interested in receiving from neighbors? (Select all that apply)
[Same options as above] -
Have you ever exchanged services with a neighbor (e.g., babysitting for yard work)?
[ ] Yes, regularly
[ ] Yes, a few times
[ ] No, but I'd be interested
[ ] No, and I wouldn't be interested -
How do you currently find help for tasks you can't do yourself? (Select all that apply)
[ ] Professional services
[ ] Ask neighbors informally
[ ] Use Nextdoor/Facebook groups
[ ] Use Craigslist or similar
[ ] Hire through TaskRabbit/Angi
[ ] Ask friends/family
[ ] Do it myself even if it's hard
[ ] Other: ________ -
On a scale of 1-10, how interested would you be in a platform that makes it easy to exchange skills with neighbors?
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] -
Would you be interested in a 30-minute interview about your neighborhood experiences? ($25 gift card)
[ ] Yes, contact me at: ________
[ ] No
Validation Survey (15-20 questions)
Purpose: Quantify problem severity, solution interest, and pricing sensitivity.
Key sections to include:
- Problem Frequency:
- How often do you need help with tasks you can't do yourself?
- How often do you have skills you'd like to share with neighbors?
- Current Solution Satisfaction:
- How satisfied are you with current ways of finding help?
- What's the biggest frustration with current options?
- Solution Interest:
- Which features would be most valuable to you?
- What would make you trust this platform?
- Pricing Sensitivity (Van Westendorp):
- At what price would you consider this too expensive?
- At what price would you consider this a bargain?
- At what price would you start to question the quality?
- At what price would you consider this too cheap to be good?
- Demographics:
- Age range
- Household income
- Neighborhood type
- Family composition
4. Landing Page Validation Experiment
Experiment Design
Goal: Validate demand and refine messaging before building the full product.
Landing Page Elements:
- Hero section with value proposition
- 3-4 key benefits with icons
- How it works (3-step visual)
- Testimonials (from early interviews)
- Pricing tiers (fake door test)
- Email signup for waitlist
- Social proof (neighborhood logos if possible)
Headlines to Test (A/B/C):
- "Turn your skills into help from neighbors - no money needed"
- "The neighborhood skill exchange that builds community"
- "Get help from trusted neighbors. Give help. Build community."
Traffic Sources:
- Facebook/Instagram ads targeting suburban neighborhoods
- Nextdoor promoted posts in target communities
- Reddit (r/suburbanliving, r/neighborhoods, etc.)
- Local Facebook groups and community forums
- Email outreach to HOAs and community associations
Metrics to Track:
- Primary:
- Waitlist signup rate (target: >5%)
- Click-through on pricing tiers (fake door)
- Secondary:
- Time on page
- Scroll depth
- Traffic source performance
- Demographic breakdown
Success Criteria
| Metric | Target | Actual | Pass? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unique visitors | 1,000+ in 2 weeks | ☐ | |
| Waitlist signup rate | >5% (50+ emails) | ☐ | |
| Email quality (bounce rate) | <10% | ☐ | |
| Pricing tier clicks (fake door) | >3% of visitors | ☐ |
Budget & Timeline
- Budget: $1,000 total ($500 for ads, $500 for landing page development)
- Timeline: 2 weeks setup, 2 weeks testing, 1 week analysis
- Tools: Carrd or Webflow for landing page, Google Analytics, Mailchimp for waitlist
5. Prototype Testing Plan
Prototype Options Comparison
| Option | Description | Cost | Timeline | Learning Potential |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Option A: Wizard of Oz | Manual matching via spreadsheet, email communication, manual credit tracking | $0 + time | 2-4 weeks | High - tests real exchange dynamics |
| Option B: Concierge MVP | High-touch service where founder manually facilitates exchanges | $0 + time | 4-6 weeks | Very High - deep user insights |
| Option C: Clickable Prototype | Figma/Framer interactive mockup showing full workflow | $200-$500 | 1-2 weeks | Medium - tests UX flow |
Recommended Approach
Start with Option A (Wizard of Oz) to validate the core exchange dynamics, then progress to Option B (Concierge MVP) for deeper insights. Use Option C (Clickable Prototype) to test specific UX flows before development.
Wizard of Oz Implementation Plan:
- Recruitment: 20-30 users from waitlist (mix of skill providers and seekers)
- Tools: Google Forms for skill profiles, Airtable for matching, Gmail for communication, Stripe for premium testing
- Process:
- Users fill out Google Form with skills offered/needed
- Manual matching based on location and skills
- Email introduction between matched users
- Manual credit tracking in spreadsheet
- Follow-up survey after exchange
- Success Metrics:
- 80%+ of matches result in completed exchanges
- Average NPS of 40+ from participants
- 50%+ express interest in premium features
Trust & Safety Prototype Testing
Critical to test the community vouch system and trust-building mechanisms.
Trust Validation Experiments:
- Vouch System Test:
- Require new users to be vouched by existing member
- Measure: % of new users who can get vouched
- Target: 70%+ success rate
- Background Check Test:
- Offer optional background checks for childcare exchanges
- Measure: % of users who opt in
- Target: 60%+ for childcare exchanges
- Rating System Test:
- Implement post-exchange ratings
- Measure: % of exchanges that receive ratings
- Target: 80%+ rating completion
6. Fake Door & Pre-Order Tests
Fake Door Test Design
Measure interest in specific features before building them.
Example Fake Door Tests:
- Premium Features:
- Button: "Get Priority Matching - $4.99/month"
- After click: "Coming soon! Join waitlist for early access"
- Success metric: >5% click rate
- Group Skill Shares:
- Button: "Host a neighborhood skill share"
- After click: "This feature is in development. Sign up to be notified when available"
- Success metric: >3% click rate
- Background Checks:
- Checkbox: "Add background check for $5 (recommended for childcare)"
- After check: "This safety feature is coming soon. We'll notify you when available"
- Success metric: >20% selection rate for childcare exchanges
Pre-Order Test Design
Measure actual willingness to pay before building the full product.
Pre-Order Implementation:
- Offer: "Early Access - 50% off first 3 months ($2.50/month instead of $4.99)"
- Process:
- User clicks "Get Early Access" button
- Redirected to Stripe checkout
- Payment processed (will be refunded if product doesn't launch)
- Thank you page: "We'll notify you when we launch in your neighborhood"
- Follow-up email with survey about their needs
- Success Metrics:
- Conversion rate: >2% of landing page visitors
- Refund rate: <20% after launch
- Average order value: >$2.50/month
- Messaging Variations to Test:
- "Support local community building - get early access"
- "Never pay for help again - join the skill exchange"
- "Build your neighborhood - be part of the movement"
Community Plan Pre-Order Test
Test demand for the HOA/community association offering.
B2B Pre-Order Approach:
- Target: HOA presidents, community association managers, neighborhood Facebook group admins
- Offer: "Launch SkillSwap in your community - first 10 communities get 50% off for life"
- Process:
- Email outreach with Calendly link for demo
- 30-minute Zoom demo of the concept
- Offer to sign up as pilot community
- Collect payment (refundable if not launched)
- Success Metric: 3+ communities sign up as pilot partners
- Outreach Script:
Subject: Help your community exchange skills - pilot opportunity
Hi [Name],
I'm reaching out because we're building SkillSwap - a platform that helps neighbors exchange skills without money. We think [Neighborhood Name] would be a perfect pilot community.
The idea is simple: residents list skills they can offer (gardening, tutoring, home repair) and skills they need. When there's a match, they exchange services using a time-based credit system.
We're looking for 10 communities to pilot this with. As a pilot partner, you'd get:
- Free setup and training
- 50% off the community plan for life
- Dedicated support from our team
Would you be open to a 15-minute call to learn more? I'd love to hear your thoughts on whether this would work for [Neighborhood Name].
Best,
[Your Name]
7. 8-Week Validation Timeline
Week-by-Week Plan
Comprehensive validation schedule with parallel tracks for problem, solution, and business validation.
| Week | Problem Validation | Solution Validation | Business Validation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 |
|
|
|
| Week 2 |
|
|
|
| Week 3 |
|
|
|
| Week 4 |
|
|
|
| Week 5 |
|
|
|
| Week 6 |
|
|
|
| Week 7 |
|
|
|
| Week 8 |
|
|
|
Go/No-Go Decision Meeting
At the end of Week 8, review all validation data against success criteria.
Decision Framework:
| Category | Metric | Target | Actual | Pass? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Problem Validation | Interviews confirming pain point | 80%+ | ☐ | |
| Survey problem severity (1-10) | 7+ average | ☐ | ||
| Current solution dissatisfaction | 70%+ | ☐ | ||
| Solution Validation | Landing page signup rate | >5% | ☐ | |
| Wizard of Oz exchange completion | 80%+ | ☐ | ||
| Prototype NPS | >40 | ☐ | ||
| Time credit system acceptance | 60%+ | ☐ | ||
| Business Validation | Premium conversion (fake door) | >3% | ☐ | |
| Pre-orders at target price | 10+ | ☐ | ||
| Pilot communities signed up | 3+ | ☐ |
Decision Rules:
- Go: 80%+ of metrics meet or exceed targets
- Pivot: 50-79% of metrics meet targets - refine concept and retest
- No-Go: <50% of metrics meet targets - significant concerns about viability
8. User Research Synthesis Template
Template for synthesizing research findings after completing validation activities.
Problem Validation Summary
Top 3 Validated Pain Points:
-
Pain Point: [e.g., "Neighbors want to help but don't know who needs what"]
Evidence: [X% of interviews, specific quotes]
Severity: [1-10 scale, average from surveys]
Example Quote: "[Quote from interview]" -
Pain Point: [e.g., "Professional services are too expensive for small tasks"]
Evidence: [X% of interviews, survey data]
Severity: [1-10 scale]
Example Quote: "[Quote from interview]" -
Pain Point: [e.g., "Current platforms lack trust and community focus"]
Evidence: [X% of interviews, competitive analysis]
Severity: [1-10 scale]
Example Quote: "[Quote from interview]"
Unexpected Findings:
- [Finding 1] - [Implications for product]
- [Finding 2] - [Implications for GTM]
- [Finding 3] - [Implications for business model]
Assumptions That Were Wrong:
- [Assumption] - [What we learned] - [How we'll adjust]
- [Assumption] - [What we learned] - [How we'll adjust]
Solution Validation Summary
Most Compelling Features:
-
Feature: [e.g., "Time-based credit system"]
Why It Resonates: [User feedback]
Validation Evidence: [X% of users, specific quotes] -
Feature: [e.g., "Community vouch system"]
Why It Resonates: [User feedback]
Validation Evidence: [X% of users] -
Feature: [e.g., "Seasonal skill suggestions"]
Why It Resonates: [User feedback]
Validation Evidence: [X% of users]
Features Users Don't Care About:
- [Feature 1] - [Evidence] - [Decision: keep/remove/iterate]
- [Feature 2] - [Evidence] - [Decision]
UX Concerns Raised:
- [Concern 1] - [Evidence] - [Proposed solution]
- [Concern 2] - [Evidence] - [Proposed solution]
- [Concern 3] - [Evidence] - [Proposed solution]
Integration Needs Identified:
- [Need 1] - [e.g., "Calendar integration for scheduling"]
- [Need 2] - [e.g., "Nextdoor/Facebook login for verification"]
- [Need 3] - [e.g., "Background check API for childcare"]
Pricing Validation Summary
Optimal Price Point:
- Consumer Premium: $X.XX/month (Van Westendorp analysis)
- Community Plan: $XX/month (B2B interviews)
- Background Checks: $X per check (user feedback)
Price Sensitivity by Segment:
| Segment | Optimal Price | Price Sensitivity | Key Insights |
|---|---|---|---|
| Suburban homeowners (35-50) | $4.99/month | Medium | Value convenience and trust |
| Retirees (65+) | $2.99/month | High | Sensitive to recurring costs |
| Young families | $5.99/month | Low | High willingness to pay for childcare help |
| HOAs/community associations | $99/month | Low | Budget for community-building initiatives |
Value Anchors:
What users compare the pricing to:
- TaskRabbit/Angi ($50+ per service)
- Netflix ($12.99/month for entertainment)
- Nextdoor (free but limited)
- Community association dues ($20-$100/month)
Pricing Model Preferences:
- 60% prefer monthly subscription
- 30% prefer pay-per-exchange
- 10% prefer annual subscription
Go-to-Market Insights
Where Users Hang Out:
- Nextdoor (most mentioned)
- Facebook neighborhood groups
- Community association meetings
- Local coffee shops and libraries
- School PTA meetings
- Church/synagogue groups
How They Discover Solutions:
- Word of mouth from trusted neighbors
- Recommendations from community leaders
- Facebook/Nextdoor posts
- Local newsletters and bulletin boards
- Community events and fairs
Decision-Making Process:
- Hear about it from trusted source
- Check if neighbors are already using it
- Evaluate trust and safety features
- Try a small exchange first
- Commit to regular use if positive experience
Buying Objections:
- Will my neighbors actually use this?
- How do I know people are trustworthy?
- Is this just another social network?
- What if I give help but don't get help in return?
- Will this be worth the monthly cost?
Trust-Building Strategies That Work:
- Community vouch system (most effective)
- Background checks for sensitive services
- Real names and photos (not anonymous)
- Ratings and reviews after exchanges
- Local community leader endorsements
- In-person launch events
Next Steps
Based on this validation plan, the immediate next steps are:
- Week 1: Launch screening survey and begin customer discovery interviews
- Week 2: Finalize landing page and begin ad campaigns
- Week 3: Analyze initial interview data and refine messaging
- Week 4: Launch pre-order test and begin Wizard of Oz prototype setup
- Week 5-6: Run Wizard of Oz prototype with 20-30 users
- Week 7: Create clickable prototype and test UX flows
- Week 8: Synthesize all research and make Go/No-Go decision